SSL Orchestrator Advanced Use Cases: Detecting Generative AI

Catching Generative AI with SSL Orchestrator Advanced Use Case

As the pace of technology development continues to increase with each passing year, cyber security in conjunction with generative AI is a growing topic worldwide. Seeing the advanced use cases reviewed here, particularly as it is applied to detecting generative AI threats from SSL Orchestrator represents a key strategic advance for cybersecurity frameworks.

It manages and controls SSL encrypted traffic at scale since more than 80% of the total internet data is binary still moving over non-secure channels. It is necessary as it assesses the risk of misuse for generative AI models that can be used to generate convincing phishing emails, create deep fakes, or also mimic genuine network traffic allowing them to bypass detection.

Concerning this last point, the SSL Orchestrator is particularly important for decrypting and inspecting SSL/TLS traffic — without the need to hamper speed or productivity. This set of advanced use cases shows how organizations should not be using the tool to monitor themselves for generative AI, but they are. For example, SSL Orchestrator employs machine learning algorithms to recognize patterns of behavior that deviate from the expected norm versus simply flagging activities like unusual data exfiltration or AI-generated content propagation;

Threat intelligence feeds feed into the integrated system to assist it in changing detection parameters on the fly. Herein lies the value of this proactive action, keeping organizations prepared a few steps ahead for the next wave of generative AI threats.

SSL Orchestrator can help correlate traditional threat detection tools and AI-generated tactics, which enables cybersecurity teams to gain a much better understanding of their security posture. These advanced analytics can churn through the high volumes of encrypted traffic looking for malcontent and alerting additional incident response actions.

Yet the review is not blind to problems. However, there are difficulties in administering those and this expands especially over the flood of guidelines concerning them just as protection. This contrast creates a delicate balance for organizations, as they must not just effectively perform SSL inspection on encrypted traffic to maintain security — more than ever it needs to be an implementable ideology driven by an equally detailed policy.