# \#snat-automap

**URL:** https://community.f5.com/tag/snat-automap/918.md

[Latest](https://community.f5.com/latest.md) · [Categories](https://community.f5.com/categories.md) · [Tags](https://community.f5.com/tags.md)

---

## [tcp\_tw\_recycle with SNAT](https://community.f5.com/t/tcp-tw-recycle-with-snat/14880)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@satish\_txt\_2254](https://community.f5.com/u/satish_txt_2254)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [May 1, 2017, 7:38am UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/tcp-tw-recycle-with-snat/14880 "2017-05-01T07:38:40Z")

</div>

We have very high volume of TIME\_WAIT and we are planning to use tcp\_tw\_recycle TCP setting on Apache Web server so we trash connection faster but many folks saying it will create issue with NAT so before enable i …

---

## [clients and servers are on the same network](https://community.f5.com/t/clients-and-servers-are-on-the-same-network/17293)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@superuser\_22978](https://community.f5.com/u/superuser_22978)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [July 23, 2016, 5:57pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/clients-and-servers-are-on-the-same-network/17293 "2016-07-23T17:57:15Z")

</div>

Hi folks, We have a load balancing scenario where the Client(10.10.10.10) and nodes (10.10.10.20 and 10.10.10.30) in the same network 10.10.10.0/24. Where the VIP is 20.20.20.20. I am using snat automap with the self …

---

## [Unable to access virtual server over port 53](https://community.f5.com/t/unable-to-access-virtual-server-over-port-53/20334)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Sarah\_258804](https://community.f5.com/u/Sarah_258804)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [April 26, 2016, 10:06pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/unable-to-access-virtual-server-over-port-53/20334 "2016-04-26T22:06:19Z")

</div>

I currently have virtual server set up a load balance across three DNS servers. If I issue command “nslookup www.google.com \[IP of VS\]” from a client machine I’m getting a DNS request time out error. I’ve verified that t…

---

## [X-Forwarded-For header](https://community.f5.com/t/x-forwarded-for-header/12830)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@MSK\_222682](https://community.f5.com/u/MSK_222682)\
**Replies:** 11\
**Last updated:** [March 24, 2016, 9:58am UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/x-forwarded-for-header/12830 "2016-03-24T09:58:16Z")

</div>

Hi All, My application team requirement is to able to see the actual client ip address whoever accessing the application instead of BIG IP address as SNAT (Auto map) is enabled. I have read some SOL on it and understa…

---

## [Kill SNAT AutoMap!](https://community.f5.com/t/kill-snat-automap/63289)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dfosborne2\_2224](https://community.f5.com/u/dfosborne2_2224)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [January 14, 2016, 8:03am UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/kill-snat-automap/63289 "2016-01-14T08:03:56Z")

</div>

Problem this snippet solves: What it does: Solves the need for getting the client ip address down into your servers for logging, etc with minimal configuration required by the engineer setting it up. No policy routes bu…

---

## [Route domain is not compatible with snat list global](https://community.f5.com/t/route-domain-is-not-compatible-with-snat-list-global/61828)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Teerarat](https://community.f5.com/u/Teerarat)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [July 29, 2015, 2:12pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/route-domain-is-not-compatible-with-snat-list-global/61828 "2015-07-29T14:12:25Z")

</div>

We have problem Route domain is not compatible with snat list global Solution f5 is one arm Existing configuration is we have snat list global for virtual server Now i create new VLAN and route domain when we creat…

---

## [SNAT Issue with two virtual servers](https://community.f5.com/t/snat-issue-with-two-virtual-servers/16036)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Kevin\_Bozman\_15](https://community.f5.com/u/Kevin_Bozman_15)\
**Replies:** 9\
**Last updated:** [January 9, 2015, 4:00pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/snat-issue-with-two-virtual-servers/16036 "2015-01-09T16:00:59Z")

</div>

I’m having an issue wrapping my head around setting up SNAT. I think SNAT is what I need. Here is my setup 192.168.103.125 – ip of server hosting IIS site www.siteA.com 192.168.103.1 Default Gateway on server A …

---

## [BIG-IP : virtual-server configuration for snat](https://community.f5.com/t/big-ip-virtual-server-configuration-for-snat/17565)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@BaltoStar\_12467](https://community.f5.com/u/BaltoStar_12467)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [May 5, 2014, 2:10pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/big-ip-virtual-server-configuration-for-snat/17565 "2014-05-05T14:10:44Z")

</div>

BIG-IP 11.4.0 Build 2384.0 Final vip-external-01 is enabled for vlan-external-01 and routes to pool-01 whose members live on vlan-internal-01. vip-external-01 has snat auto-map enabled. vip-internal-01 is enabled f…

---

## [BIG-IP : how to determine Self-IP used by SNAT ?](https://community.f5.com/t/big-ip-how-to-determine-self-ip-used-by-snat/17544)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@BaltoStar\_12467](https://community.f5.com/u/BaltoStar_12467)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [December 28, 2013, 4:15am UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/big-ip-how-to-determine-self-ip-used-by-snat/17544 "2013-12-28T04:15:17Z")

</div>

BIG-IP 11.4.0 Build 2384.0 Final On my Virtual Server , I have Source Address Translation = Auto-Map ( I believe this is the same as SNAT , correct ? ) How to determine the Self IP that BIG-IP will substitute-in…

---

## [SNAT POOL AUTOMAP ISSUE](https://community.f5.com/t/snat-pool-automap-issue/16620)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@nick871230\_1404](https://community.f5.com/u/nick871230_1404)\
**Replies:** 8\
**Last updated:** [December 26, 2013, 12:39pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/snat-pool-automap-issue/16620 "2013-12-26T12:39:29Z")

</div>

Hi: Here is the topology: Client-192.168.81.61--------F5-130.97.120.19---------------Server-130.97.121.131 the client(192.168.81.61) want to connect the server(130.97.121.131) with a virtual ip 192.168.120.131:9000…

---

## [APM with multiple routedomains and SNAT automap](https://community.f5.com/t/apm-with-multiple-routedomains-and-snat-automap/10137)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@scorpa\_121336](https://community.f5.com/u/scorpa_121336)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [September 12, 2013, 3:22pm UTC](https://community.f5.com/t/apm-with-multiple-routedomains-and-snat-automap/10137 "2013-09-12T15:22:58Z")

</div>

Hello! I have this policy 1.Auth user in localDB 2.According to user assign ip lease pool, routedomain and SNAT auto map. So this is not working. When user connecting he got valid ip lease pool but SNAT is not in e…
